It’s an interesting time in the world of language teaching and learning.
In July, the biannual conference of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers Association highlighted the need to urgently review how we teach languages in schools and universities.
This was the first conference since the introduction of ChatGPT and the dramatic uptake of AI by educators, students and parents. Since the arrival of AI, there has been a mistaken – but growing – belief by some that AI has made the need to learn a new language redundant.
While AI has its place in schools and in education more broadly, so does learning a language. It is still relevant and it still delivers so many benefits – as anyone who has worked hard to build proficiency in more than one language knows!
AI can help with basic and transactional communication, but it can’t replicate the essential elements of learning a language such as developing cultural empathy, understanding nuance and building authenticity and trust.
Language learning opens doors to greater cultural literacy, adaptability and global competence, which are all critical if we are going to better understand different contexts and cultures.
Andreas Schleicher, Director for Education and Skills at the OECD, has said the job of educators is to develop ‘first-class humans’, not ‘second-class robots’ who are unable to read between the lines, or to hear what’s been left unsaid. Learning a language equips young people to do this.
September has also been an interesting month for the future of Chinese language in Australia. During the Premier’s visit to China, the Victorian Government announced its new China Strategy: For a New Golden Era.
This aims to transform Victoria into a ‘leading hub for China-related expertise’, and for schools and tertiary institutions to promote Chinese language and cultural literacy. The strategy sees learning Chinese as a gateway to developing cultural knowledge, building personal connections on campus, engaging in sister school partnerships, and taking part in youth forums where Australian students learn to interact more effectively with their Chinese peers.
For the first time, Victorians with Chinese ancestry and international students are also explicitly recognised as having an essential role in delivering on these goals.
At the time of writing, a federal parliamentary inquiry into Building Asia Capability in Australia through the education system and beyond is re-exploring the notion of ‘Asia capability,’ and initial recommendations include improving language skills, intercultural understanding, regional engagement and diplomacy skills.
Already the inquiry is sparking interesting debates about what Asia Literacy means now, compared to when the term was first introduced more than a decade ago.
“[A] second-track Asia literacy has emerged – driven by demography, technology and mobility. Migration from Asia has reshaped Australia’s cultural landscape, while social media and AI have enabled experiential engagement with Asian languages and cultures. Youth-led initiatives, scholarships, and diaspora networks are building experiential Asia competency outside our education system,” says Philipp Ivanov, former CEO of Asia Society Australia and the current CEO of GRASP (Geopolitical Risks and Strategy Practice).
So how are educators preparing students to engage with the world? What is the best way forward? Language proficiency alone does not make ‘first-class humans.’ It needs to be coupled with the skills, knowledge and experience that come with connecting globally.
Stanley Wang (Deputy Principal, One Haileybury), Grenville Green (Deputy Principal, Junior School), and Dr Stephan Muller (Deputy Principal, International), have been working on Haileybury’s approach to this challenge for more than 18 months.